<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critics and Evangelists: A Communication Starter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/11/critics-and-evangelists-a-communication-starter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/11/critics-and-evangelists-a-communication-starter/</link>
	<description>Make Things Happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/11/critics-and-evangelists-a-communication-starter/comment-page-1/#comment-10160</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=843#comment-10160</guid>
		<description>In my shop (over 12,000 people) I&#039;ve found that the most challenging us-vs.-them conversations are between technical evangelists who see the (especially internal) collaboration tools as being (a) the whole of social media and (b) the cure for all organizational ills - and the social media strategists who see SM as a tool among many tools for engaging/informing/tapping into both internal and external stakeholders. (I&#039;m in the latter category.) Maybe it&#039;s because the languages we speak are actually so close together - but the objectives we&#039;re pursuing are distinct - that the gaps between our discourses seem so difficult to bridge. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my shop (over 12,000 people) I&#8217;ve found that the most challenging us-vs.-them conversations are between technical evangelists who see the (especially internal) collaboration tools as being (a) the whole of social media and (b) the cure for all organizational ills &#8211; and the social media strategists who see SM as a tool among many tools for engaging/informing/tapping into both internal and external stakeholders. (I&#8217;m in the latter category.) Maybe it&#8217;s because the languages we speak are actually so close together &#8211; but the objectives we&#8217;re pursuing are distinct &#8211; that the gaps between our discourses seem so difficult to bridge. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/11/critics-and-evangelists-a-communication-starter/comment-page-1/#comment-22908</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=843#comment-22908</guid>
		<description>In my shop (over 12,000 people) I&#039;ve found that the most challenging us-vs.-them conversations are between technical evangelists who see the (especially internal) collaboration tools as being (a) the whole of social media and (b) the cure for all organizational ills - and the social media strategists who see SM as a tool among many tools for engaging/informing/tapping into both internal and external stakeholders. (I&#039;m in the latter category.) Maybe it&#039;s because the languages we speak are actually so close together - but the objectives we&#039;re pursuing are distinct - that the gaps between our discourses seem so difficult to bridge. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my shop (over 12,000 people) I&#8217;ve found that the most challenging us-vs.-them conversations are between technical evangelists who see the (especially internal) collaboration tools as being (a) the whole of social media and (b) the cure for all organizational ills &#8211; and the social media strategists who see SM as a tool among many tools for engaging/informing/tapping into both internal and external stakeholders. (I&#8217;m in the latter category.) Maybe it&#8217;s because the languages we speak are actually so close together &#8211; but the objectives we&#8217;re pursuing are distinct &#8211; that the gaps between our discourses seem so difficult to bridge. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Four Spheres Of Social Media Strategy &#124; Social Media Explorer</title>
		<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/11/critics-and-evangelists-a-communication-starter/comment-page-1/#comment-8048</link>
		<dc:creator>The Four Spheres Of Social Media Strategy &#124; Social Media Explorer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=843#comment-8048</guid>
		<description>[...] Critics and Evangelists: A Communication Starter (altitudebranding.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Critics and Evangelists: A Communication Starter (altitudebranding.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

