<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relationships Aren&#8217;t Universal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/12/relationships-arent-universal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/12/relationships-arent-universal/</link>
	<description>Make Things Happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/12/relationships-arent-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-14061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=927#comment-14061</guid>
		<description>Amber,

First, let me apologize for not commenting on this much, much sooner.  As I was the one that (apparently) inspired the deeper thought, I really should have responded by now.

However, when you posted this in Dec. 2009, I was re-evaluating/converting my blog.  The blog is still at the same URL, but now it&#039;s a Daddy Blog.  I have a 2-yr. old and a flip camera.  So I decided to put those, plus my writing ability to good use.

I still write about SM when the mood strikes me, but the blog isn&#039;t devoted solely to that any longer.  Needless to say, I just realized they you linked to my blog.

Thank you so much for the link.  I always appreciate it.  I will still be reading/commenting here everyday.  I just wanted to alert you, in case any of your readers clicked on the link to my blog and thought, &quot;what the?&quot;

You&#039;re the best.  Take care.

Jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amber,</p>
<p>First, let me apologize for not commenting on this much, much sooner.  As I was the one that (apparently) inspired the deeper thought, I really should have responded by now.</p>
<p>However, when you posted this in Dec. 2009, I was re-evaluating/converting my blog.  The blog is still at the same URL, but now it&#8217;s a Daddy Blog.  I have a 2-yr. old and a flip camera.  So I decided to put those, plus my writing ability to good use.</p>
<p>I still write about SM when the mood strikes me, but the blog isn&#8217;t devoted solely to that any longer.  Needless to say, I just realized they you linked to my blog.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for the link.  I always appreciate it.  I will still be reading/commenting here everyday.  I just wanted to alert you, in case any of your readers clicked on the link to my blog and thought, &#8220;what the?&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re the best.  Take care.</p>
<p>Jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/12/relationships-arent-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-23249</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=927#comment-23249</guid>
		<description>Amber,

First, let me apologize for not commenting on this much, much sooner.  As I was the one that (apparently) inspired the deeper thought, I really should have responded by now.

However, when you posted this in Dec. 2009, I was re-evaluating/converting my blog.  The blog is still at the same URL, but now it&#039;s a Daddy Blog.  I have a 2-yr. old and a flip camera.  So I decided to put those, plus my writing ability to good use.

I still write about SM when the mood strikes me, but the blog isn&#039;t devoted solely to that any longer.  Needless to say, I just realized they you linked to my blog.

Thank you so much for the link.  I always appreciate it.  I will still be reading/commenting here everyday.  I just wanted to alert you, in case any of your readers clicked on the link to my blog and thought, &quot;what the?&quot;

You&#039;re the best.  Take care.

Jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amber,</p>
<p>First, let me apologize for not commenting on this much, much sooner.  As I was the one that (apparently) inspired the deeper thought, I really should have responded by now.</p>
<p>However, when you posted this in Dec. 2009, I was re-evaluating/converting my blog.  The blog is still at the same URL, but now it&#8217;s a Daddy Blog.  I have a 2-yr. old and a flip camera.  So I decided to put those, plus my writing ability to good use.</p>
<p>I still write about SM when the mood strikes me, but the blog isn&#8217;t devoted solely to that any longer.  Needless to say, I just realized they you linked to my blog.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for the link.  I always appreciate it.  I will still be reading/commenting here everyday.  I just wanted to alert you, in case any of your readers clicked on the link to my blog and thought, &#8220;what the?&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re the best.  Take care.</p>
<p>Jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy Beer</title>
		<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2009/12/relationships-arent-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-9886</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy Beer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=927#comment-9886</guid>
		<description>&quot;Building relationships&quot; (whatever that ends up meaning) is just another way businesses are trying to measure ROI in social media. But there&#039;s nothing less fun than knowing you&#039;re talking to someone who&#039;s trying to measure the cash value of your conversation! 
There&#039;s also not many real people who think they have a &#039;relationship&#039; with a &#039;brand&#039; or a &#039;company.&#039; Most people have relationships with other people. So I think businesses should feel free to measure the heck out of the ROI on their &#039;business&#039; profiles where they do more of the selling and where people know they are interacting with A Company (rather than a human), and so have different expectations (which are more transactional- they expect to be goaded into the sales funnel with discounts, promotions, etc). But I think businesses should have additional social profiles where they let their employees act as the real humans they are in social media - transparently on behalf of the company - but interacting as it is appropriate according to the situation. Provide customer service, give a discount, or have a friendly chat etc - whatever seems appropriate. Sure, track it and see what happens, but don&#039;t breathe down their necks about ROI. Real people (i.e. potential customers) don&#039;t want to be measured or have a value placed on their heads, so ironically, to get the best ROI in social media, businesses will have to actually care less about it than they currently do. I&#039;m not saying they should participate aimlessly - certainly have goals etc but more human-centered ones where the value is placed on the quality of interaction rather than the monetary value derived from it. It&#039;s a bit of a Zen koan, but I believe the companies that are least attached to the &quot;ROI&quot; will actually achieve the most.
.-= Lucy Beer&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/webtrainingwheels/bPWa/~3/N3ChfJuly1M/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;10 Tips For Integrating Social Media Into Your Marketing Mix&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Building relationships&#8221; (whatever that ends up meaning) is just another way businesses are trying to measure ROI in social media. But there&#8217;s nothing less fun than knowing you&#8217;re talking to someone who&#8217;s trying to measure the cash value of your conversation!<br />
There&#8217;s also not many real people who think they have a &#8216;relationship&#8217; with a &#8216;brand&#8217; or a &#8216;company.&#8217; Most people have relationships with other people. So I think businesses should feel free to measure the heck out of the ROI on their &#8216;business&#8217; profiles where they do more of the selling and where people know they are interacting with A Company (rather than a human), and so have different expectations (which are more transactional- they expect to be goaded into the sales funnel with discounts, promotions, etc). But I think businesses should have additional social profiles where they let their employees act as the real humans they are in social media &#8211; transparently on behalf of the company &#8211; but interacting as it is appropriate according to the situation. Provide customer service, give a discount, or have a friendly chat etc &#8211; whatever seems appropriate. Sure, track it and see what happens, but don&#8217;t breathe down their necks about ROI. Real people (i.e. potential customers) don&#8217;t want to be measured or have a value placed on their heads, so ironically, to get the best ROI in social media, businesses will have to actually care less about it than they currently do. I&#8217;m not saying they should participate aimlessly &#8211; certainly have goals etc but more human-centered ones where the value is placed on the quality of interaction rather than the monetary value derived from it. It&#8217;s a bit of a Zen koan, but I believe the companies that are least attached to the &#8220;ROI&#8221; will actually achieve the most.<br />
.-= Lucy Beer&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/webtrainingwheels/bPWa/~3/N3ChfJuly1M/" rel="nofollow">10 Tips For Integrating Social Media Into Your Marketing Mix</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

