http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/04/indispensable-vs-irreplaceable/ Make Things Happen Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:55:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/04/indispensable-vs-irreplaceable/comment-page-1/#comment-16038 jon Thu, 06 May 2010 07:54:04 +0000 http://altitudebranding.com/?p=1312#comment-16038 Oh, My Dear... I like it very much! Thanks! <a href="http://www.chinacellphones.net" rel="nofollow">chian cell phones</a> Oh, My Dear…
I like it very much! Thanks!
chian cell phones

]]> http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/04/indispensable-vs-irreplaceable/comment-page-1/#comment-24020 jon Thu, 06 May 2010 07:54:00 +0000 http://altitudebranding.com/?p=1312#comment-24020 Oh, My Dear... I like it very much! Thanks! <a href="http://www.chinacellphones.net" rel="nofollow">chian cell phones</a> Oh, My Dear…
I like it very much! Thanks!
chian cell phones

]]> http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/04/indispensable-vs-irreplaceable/comment-page-1/#comment-15934 Kelly Hemingway Mon, 03 May 2010 18:01:09 +0000 http://altitudebranding.com/?p=1312#comment-15934 As a recent follower and new fan of Amber, I found this to be a very interesting discussion on the difference between being indispensable vs irreplaceable. People who focus on being irreplaceable are often protectionists who hoard intellectual property to ensure the importance of their role and are motivated by the illusion that they are creating job security. It's more important to focus on development of skills that are transferable to any role as you develop your career. The protectionists often find themselves stuck in a role that stifles growth and narrows their opportunities. I was so excited about the distinction that Amber pointed out that I linked to her article from my recent blog article "Do Protectionists Get Trapped by an Illusion?" on www.tyrometer.com because it was such a nice tie in. I really enjoy your commentary, Amber. Very provocative and hard hitting. Thanks for all the food for thought. As a recent follower and new fan of Amber, I found this to be a very interesting discussion on the difference between being indispensable vs irreplaceable. People who focus on being irreplaceable are often protectionists who hoard intellectual property to ensure the importance of their role and are motivated by the illusion that they are creating job security. It’s more important to focus on development of skills that are transferable to any role as you develop your career. The protectionists often find themselves stuck in a role that stifles growth and narrows their opportunities. I was so excited about the distinction that Amber pointed out that I linked to her article from my recent blog article “Do Protectionists Get Trapped by an Illusion?” on http://www.tyrometer.com because it was such a nice tie in. I really enjoy your commentary, Amber. Very provocative and hard hitting. Thanks for all the food for thought.

]]>