<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brass Tack Thinking &#187; media relations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com/tag/media-relations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com</link>
	<description>Make Things Happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>The Pitch That Worked</title>
		<link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/03/the-pitch-that-worked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/03/the-pitch-that-worked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Naslund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog pitching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitudebranding.com/?p=1208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tweeted the other day that I got a really great pitch via email, and dozens of folks immediately wanted me to share it. But I won&#8217;t, partly because I don&#8217;t have permission, but mostly because it shouldn&#8217;t matter. Writing a decent email pitch isn&#8217;t complicated. And I know some <span class="post_excerpt_readmore"><a href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/03/the-pitch-that-worked/" title="Read more">Read more &#187;</a></span><p><br/><br/>A post from <a href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com">Brass Tack Thinking</a>
<br/><a href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/03/the-pitch-that-worked/">The Pitch That Worked</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/3686297228_9284c8a0ee.jpg"><img class="alignright" style="padding-left:5px" title="Altitude Branding - The Pitch That Worked" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/3686297228_9284c8a0ee.jpg" alt="Altitude Branding - The Pitch That Worked" width="251" height="300" /></a>I tweeted the other day that I got a really great pitch via email, and dozens of folks immediately wanted me to share it. But I won&#8217;t, partly because I don&#8217;t have permission, but mostly because it shouldn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>Writing a decent email pitch isn&#8217;t complicated. And I know some folks are looking for the Almighty Template (to you, I say sternly and a bit impatiently: quit looking for shortcuts and learn for yourself). But here&#8217;s my assessment of why this pitch worked, and a bit of a tricky bit at the end that is really the linchpin of the whole thing.</p>
<p><strong>Concise</strong></p>
<p>We all get tons of email. No one &#8211; I repeat, no one &#8211; wants to wade through a tome of paragraphs and prose. Send a nice intro, a quick summary, a few key details, and let the recipient ask for more information if they&#8217;re interested in it. If I&#8217;m interested, I WILL ask for more info. If I&#8217;m not, all the words in the world aren&#8217;t going to convince me otherwise.</p>
<p><strong>Personal</strong></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you dare try to say &#8220;I love your blog&#8221; if you&#8217;ve read the last three posts and are attempting to feign interest. I don&#8217;t care if you love or even read my blog, and that&#8217;s not important to me if your pitch is good. What&#8217;s more important is that you&#8217;re friendly, personable, and interested in me and what I do, and the audience and community I serve. We&#8217;re all people here, and while we have jobs to do, it matters to me that we can talk to each other like humans and not &#8220;bloggers&#8221; and &#8220;PR people&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Focused</strong></p>
<p>Know exactly what you&#8217;re asking me to pay attention to, and point to it directly. In this case, it was a project, and it came with a quick summary of the purpose of the project and a link. Are you asking me to cover it on my blog? Tweet about it? Take some action of some kind? (This one actually will require a pretty significant commitment on my part if I do it). Be precise, and tell me exactly what you&#8217;re asking me to commit to so I can put it straight on my to-do list if I&#8217;m interested. Open ended means that I have to stash it to think about later, and even with the best intentions, that can sometimes mean it gets forgotten.</p>
<p><strong>Relevant</strong></p>
<p>And that means relevant to <em>me not you</em>. A little research can tell someone that I&#8217;m in the social media space as a community director for a software company, I have a daughter, I travel a lot, stuff like that. Any of those three categories is at least a starting place to see if your stuff lines up with my universe. And while I know you can&#8217;t read my mind, at least let me know what dots you connected, as in &#8220;I know you&#8217;re a mom, and we&#8217;re hoping that you might find something like this fun to do with your kids.&#8221; And hey, this is shocking, but if you&#8217;re in doubt about a fit, why not ask<em> before</em> you pitch?</p>
<p><strong>Sticky Part: Interesting Project</strong></p>
<p>This is what it ALL boils down to, guys. All the PR polish, best practices, and well-written pitches in the world will not do a damned thing if your project, product, or idea isn&#8217;t interesting. And that means interesting to other people. It&#8217;s really easy to convince ourselves that something is big news to US because we&#8217;re close to it, instead of looking at the news with some perspective.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s hard. I know you get saddled with crap from your clients that isn&#8217;t remotely newsworthy, yet you&#8217;re commanded to go out there and tell people about it anyway. Your job is to either find a way to make it interesting, or be brave enough to push back on your client and tell them why it isn&#8217;t. You&#8217;re paid to be an adviser and protector of the relationships you have with your media contacts, not just a lackey that follows direction blindly.</p>
<p>That also means that if &#8220;interesting&#8221; is relevant to just a small, niche group &#8211; like, say, buyers of specialized medical equipment &#8211; then guess what? That&#8217;s who you pitch. Even if there&#8217;s only 10 of them. And again, you have to teach your clients that no, Gary Vee is not likely to do a video about it, and that they should be fishing in the proper pond, no matter if it&#8217;s large or small. Volume doesn&#8217;t equal impact. If they&#8217;re not listening, or if <em>you</em> don&#8217;t understand that, maybe neither of you are ready to be doing this kind of outreach.</p>
<p><strong>The Unteachables</strong></p>
<p>All of these things require a bit of judgment and finesse, which isn&#8217;t really teachable, unfortunately. It&#8217;s about saying to yourself &#8220;If I were the blogger here, outside of my bias, would this get my attention and why?&#8221; Being honest with yourself about that as a HUMAN instead of just the media relations pro can help an awful lot.</p>
<p>And I teeter on the fence all the time about whether you can teach people and relationship skills. Can you teach someone to pen an email that&#8217;s friendly yet professional? I don&#8217;t know. I feel like many of the people I know that do it best just, well, do it. It&#8217;s just wired into the way they work. I know personally I never got &#8220;coached&#8221; about how to send an email to a donor prospect. I just knew what felt like the right tone and approach.</p>
<p>I believe you can teach nuance, style, all that mechanical stuff. But can you really teach intent? I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
<p><strong>So Then.</strong></p>
<p>Have I told you all the stuff you already know? And if so, why are so many folks still struggling with this? Or is this all revolutionary and new and not obvious? I&#8217;m really eager to understand the Quest for the Perfect Pitch and why it seems to go wrong so often. Big discussion I know, but what the heck.</p>
<p>Sound off.</p>
<h5><em>image credit: </em><a title="Link to JonathanRossi's photostream" rel="dc:creator cc:attributionURL" href="/photos/jwrossi/"><strong><em>JonathanRossi</em></strong></a></h5>
<p> </p>
<div id="facebook_like"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.brasstackthinking.com%2F2010%2F03%2Fthe-pitch-that-worked%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=500&amp;action=like&amp;font=segoe+ui&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:500px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div><p><br/><br/>A post from <a href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com">Brass Tack Thinking</a>
<br/><a href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/03/the-pitch-that-worked/">The Pitch That Worked</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2010/03/the-pitch-that-worked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

